Thanks to @fear.lies.reality for the opinion post! (On a side note we can't reach L because she got the zucc, if she cannot reply within a while we will be forced to pick a new admin)
M- I think fascism could work but as a sort of electoral fascism the people would choose one supreme ruler who would at most run for 2 years before the next election and keeping the power would in a sense keep the leader in check happy people means more votes which means getting more of what you want done. So basically I'm saying the people would elect a supreme leader who then runs the country and his own power keeps him in check.
D- I am really interested in Fascism. I've been reading a lot and I admire certain fascist leaders. I believe I am most interested in the nationalism and pride within the ideology. When it comes to it, I believe it could be viable, but I somewhat have come to doubt it would work for long periods of time. However, I definitely believe it could be viable, and it definitely helps countries grow stronger and more proud.
N- Not in a permanent form. People will never be unified in an idea and revolt is inevitable.
B- Fascism is viable 100% in a democracy. A Fascist party (if the PiS isn't already considered one) could easily come to power right about now in Eastern Europe. My problem with Fascism is that it can lead to Tolitarianism, as well as the fact that I just plain disagree with it.
Partners: @the.friendly.minarchist @rightwingism @leftwingism @_rightwing_ @victoriaeuropa_ @publius_ii @social_autocrat @juchemovement @liber_cogitare @thebasedmaltese @agrarian.autocrat